Guess what came in the mail?! That’s right. My copy of the Classic Pop: Duran Duran 40th Anniversary Edition magazine. Right away, I can see that there is a LOT here as it is really over 100 pages. Clearly, I won’t be able to read it all at once, not if I want to really take it in. So, I will simply read one article at a time and discuss it then talk about the magazine as a whole. After all, I can tell that the creators took time to worry about the details. This can be easily seen because as soon as you open the magazine there are pictures of various album and single covers. It reminds me, as a fan, about how much the band really has done.
I loved reading the welcome written by the editor. Said to say that it is rare to read glowing words about Duran Duran outside of places like our blog or other fan creations. Yet, this intro was all that and more. Clearly, the editor views Duran as a band who has had adversity but has worked hard to be successful. “They’ve marked out by a peerless flair for melodic songwriting as well as a remarkable resilience, digging in and clinging to their dreams when the naysayers foolishly try to write them off.” Exactly. Then, before the first article, the magazine acknowledges the graphic design and art used for the album and single covers. I approve.
Conquering Planet Earth:
Initially, I assumed that this first big article would just be about the very early days but it goes all the way up through the 1980s. Before I read the article, I did glance at the photos. I assumed I had seen most of the Duran pictures before but I swear some of these images were new to me. I love that!
The beginning part of the article focuses on the formation of the band and the Birmingham scene. Nick is quoted in the article talking about how the Rum Runner was “more real” in comparison to the London scene due to the Berrow brothers bringing music from the States and with the look of the club with mirror tiles and neon. That said, I’m not sure that they got the history totally right. I think the list of people is accurate but I’m not sure things happened in the order that they are listed, specifically around the topic of lead singer. For example, it sounds like Andy was in the band a long time before Simon and I don’t think that is true.
One aspect of the article that I found interesting was how the videos were described. First, it implied that the reason to use video was because the band had five good looking guys. While that is true. they also could send videos to places that were hard to get to like Australia, which the article leaves out. That said, they do state that the Girls on Film video might have objectified women but other videos objectified them like the Rio video. Hmm…
Of course, the band’s success was featured as well. The author commented that the band members’ private lives were quickly impacted by all of the fans and attention. Now, artists would be able to post a picture or tweet to appease their fans but then they couldn’t, resulting in fans following the band everywhere, claims the author. Interesting. I don’t know if I agree with that idea. Would a picture or a tweet really satisfy fans then? I think a lot of fans would have just wanted more and more and more. What do the rest of you think? Would that have eased the frenzy?
Overall, I think the article did a nice job summarizing the 1980s. I appreciate that it included some of the late 80s as too often that part of Duran’s history gets ignored or glossed over. I also liked that the interpretation on issues like fame made me think. Lastly, the little touches made it extra special. For example, the article covered four tracks more deeply to show the range of Duran’s work. I liked that and the fun little facts written in tiny writing on the side. The magazine did not waste space!
Now, I cannot wait to have a chance to dive deep into the rest!