In the music section, they were asked 9 questions regarding the following topics: All You Need is Now, box set of all material, redoing songs, releasing singles, Reportage, fans, critical acclaim and the next album. I won’t transcribe the questions and their answers as you can listen for yourself, but I will comment about what I found interesting or what struck me. Rhonda also sent me comments as well so I will include those, too.
The first question regarded All You Need is Now. The band, in response, discussed both Mark Ronson and Red Carpet Massacre, their previous album. John talked about how RCM was the “farthest” out from the Duran sound they had gone. This, of course, is reassuring to those of us who felt like the album didn’t feel like Duran. Clearly, there was a reason, which as John pointed out, included that there was few live bass, drums and guitar. He’s right about that not being typical and many of us missed that. John also said that they were happy with the results. I wished there could have been a follow-up to that since those ideas don’t seem to go together. What about the results made them happy? Did he think they were quality songs? Did the songwriting work? As for AYNIN, they acknowledged that they don’t look back at their own history but were ready to after RCM. For that, I will be grateful that RCM happened as it sounds like they wouldn’t have been ready to recapture their sound without that experience.
The next question that caught my attention was the one about whether or not they would redo any of their songs. Roger said that he wouldn’t, which is the standard answer for them. Simon, on the other hand, would want to rerecord Someone Else Not Me as he felt it would be too slow. John said that he would be up for it. Fascinating. They also mentioned a song called, “Don’t Look Back” that was done around the time of Wild Boys. I’m sure that all Duranies would love to hear that one along with the Reportage album that they hope will be released one day, according to this roundtable!!!! Then, John also mentioned adding a choir and strings to Finest Hour, which thrills both Rhonda and I. Of course, I doubt any of those will see the light of day but dreams are free. It was interesting to me that Simon and John did say they would redo songs as I have always heard them with their philosophy of no regrets and how they love all their songs equally. I wonder what changed, especially since later in the roundtable John says that he wouldn’t have done anything differently as he likes where they are at now so little decisions don’t matter that much.
Then, of course, they talked about singles. To John, they truly don’t seem relevant anymore. Hmm…he did say that radio play doesn’t matter as they can still have good shows and get the music out there. I wonder if he would think differently if they were an upcoming band trying to make it. Yet, they did say that they chose AYNIN as the “focus” track as it had many of the album’s ideas in it. I have to agree with this. I know that there was much discussion when it first came out, especially with that jarring beginning. Yet, that song does, at least, for me, capture the spirit of the album. As for wishing some songs made it as singles, Roger mentioned Beautiful Colours that didn’t even make it on the album and John mentioned using a Timbaland track for RCM. My thoughts on those songs are this. Beautiful Colours should have, at least, been on the album. They had many quality tracks from that era that wasn’t used and should have been, including Salt in the Rainbow and Virus. As for Timbaland, I may remind him that they had Night Runner up on some site before the album for people to listen to and it was not well-received. Maybe that had something to do with the decision to release Falling Down instead. For me, it would have been tough to take a Timbaland song as the single since I really pretty much hated them. I, at least, liked Falling Down. I wonder what the fan community would have been like if they had released Night Runner as the single. That said, I suppose one of those tracks would have better represented the album, which could be important, if that is the main purpose of “singles” now.
The last two questions that caused me to react were the ones about critical acclaim and AYNIN influencing the next album. As far as critical acclaim goes, they acknowledge that it did hurt to have some particular magazines that they read and believed as kids be critical. Yet, they knew that what they were doing was right and that outweighed any of the negative statements. They wondered if the critics didn’t like them because they weren’t needed for their success unlike other artists. My response to this is simple. There are many reasons why the critics slammed them from what I have been reading, which I have been writing about in the chapter I’m working on for the book.
As far as AYNIN influencing the next album, Simon’s response, especially caught my attention as well as Rhonda’s. Simon said that the main objective to AYNIN was to connect to the fans and that he doesn’t think they would have made another album if that didn’t happen. We think he is absolutely right both about having another album and about having their focus be on connecting with fans. We were around during the RCM days. The fan community was dejected and divided. It seemed like all the positive feelings that came with the reunion and Astronaut were gone, even for the fans that liked RCM. It wasn’t that fun to be a Duranie then and many (most?) of us felt that the wall between the band and the fans was so tall that there would never be a connection made. I think a lot of us were wondering if the end was near. Thus, like John, I, too, think it is good that they are working with Mark Ronson again. I’m sure it makes things easier for them and it helps all of us, fans, look forward to what is next. We have hope that the connection will remain moving forward.
Tomorrow, I will discuss the rest of the roundtable! Until then, let us know what you thought of their answers. What caught your attention and why?