The other day DDHQ tweeted this:
I saw it when it was tweeted but had no idea what it was about. Sadly, I didn’t have much of a chance to look closer at it. I had a sense that the quote about the band lacking a private life was something said in the 80s but I didn’t even notice that People was listed in the tweet. Now, because it is the weekend, I have had a chance to actual click on the link. If you haven’t done it, I recommend it. You can go here: “Duran Duran Was ‘Hungry Like the Wolf’ for Stardom-And Then Came Along MTV.”
The link is to an article that appeared in People magazine on December 5, 1983. Well, I read it. On one hand, it was exactly what I was expecting and on the other, it wasn’t. Frankly, I know that Duran faced a boatload of criticism during the 80s and assumed that this article would be filled with insulting language. While it wasn’t perfect, it could have been worse. Interestingly enough, the most negative statements came from quotes from critics not involved in this particular article. A perfect example of this was this paragraph: “How important was MTV in the rise of Duran Duran? All-important, some critics contend. As David Handler put it: “After all, the clips are a heckuva lot more striking than the music, which is little more than pasteurized, synthesized pop-rock with video launching pads for lyrics.” What always fascinated me then and still does now, why is having MTV important to Duran’s success a bad thing? I know that the critics would say something along the lines of how their music should speak for itself but isn’t MTV just a means of getting their music out there? Is it really that different than appearances on shows like Top of the Pops or American Bandstand? After all, fans can see what they look like on those shows.
I appreciated the fact that the article featured what I saw as generally accurate history of the band’s formation. Beyond that, People magazine reported on the recording of Seven and the Ragged Tiger and how their fame had really become overwhelming. The best line, though, of the whole article, in my opinion, was not the one that DDHQ quoted but the last line. “We don’t want to be has-beens by the time we’re 25,” said Roger. “It would be the worst thing in the world to go around saying to people, ‘Do you know who I used to be?’ ” Oh, Roger, if only I could have told him in 1983 that they definitely wouldn’t be has-beens by the time that they were 25 or 35 or 45 or even 55. People still know who they are.