Tag Archives: Tumblr

Social media: Facets on Diamonds in the Mind

First of all, have you done your Duranie homework yet?  I know, I know – the “homework” portion of Daily Duranie is typically handled by my more-than-capable cohort, but since I just over at our message boards, I decided to mention it. In order to participate, one must register for the boards – no “anonymous” participants (sorry!), but you can pick whatever screen name you’d like and join in the fun.

Speaking of our message boards, I’m really pleased with the small group that is beginning to call the board “home”. If you’ve been shy about joining, or are nervous to join due to preconceptions of what message boards have been like in the past, I encourage you to come and take a gander. The board is small, and it’s been very friendly thus far, which is something that will continue. We aren’t there to debate the blog, or really have hard conversations about much of anything – it’s really a safe place to find community. I really hope to see more of readers participate. The more active the board, the more time people will spend there.

Interestingly enough, Daily Duranie has a number of different social media you can find us on these days. Not only do we have the blog, but we have a Facebook page, a Twitter page, a presence on both Google + and Tumblr, a YouTube channel, and the message board. I’ve done some reading recently about social media and audiences – and I’m fascinated by the idea that some rather prominent figures out there believe that the same basic type of audience can be found across all avenues of social media. Amanda and I have had lengthy conversations about this ourselves, and we’ve found something quite different in our case.

Oddly, we can post a blog here and, depending upon the topic, we can get a variety of responses and they are definitely not all the same. For example (hypothetically speaking), where the response might be all positive on Facebook, Twitter could be otherwise.  Comments here on the blog itself are usually far, far different from the comments we get in other places – not better or worse, just completely different. The demographics we reach for each type of media are very different as well. Tumblr seems to be a bit younger. Google + is hard to tell, no one really sticks around there for long, although we do get comments from time to time. Twitter and Facebook seem diametrically opposed to one another most of the time – and what I mean by that is however people are commenting or feeling on one, it is the opposite on the other. That includes if we’re getting a ton of comments in one place, we’re not getting any in the other. We post some video blogs from time to time on YouTube, and our responses there seem to be from mostly males (although rest assured there are females too), and quite frankly they seem to be pretty tech-savvy to the music industry, which is great! And, our message board? It’s the warm-fuzzy place. There’s not a lot of talk about the blog, per se (which I for one appreciate!), and it’s the place where Duranies can come, fangirl or fanboy themselves out, and not be judged. I applaud that.

Sweeping generalizations aside, my point is that the audiences across the social media spectrum are not the same. Whats more, I’m learning no matter how many places we post, engage or reach, we’re still finding fans that are more than thankful to find the blog, find other fans, or find a place to chat about the band….and there isn’t a ton of overlap, meaning that our audience on Twitter is fairly unique. If you’re checking us out on Facebook, maybe you’re not that active on Twitter. Or, if you’re into YouTube, you might not love Tumblr, and so on. For someone like me, who stumbled into this whole social media thing and learns as I go, each day brings on a new learning curve, and I love it.

It’s fairly easy to form an incredibly myopic view in fandom if you’re sticking to one source of social media. Fandom has a sort of “mob-mentality” that goes along for the ride when someone decides to stick their neck out on one issue or another. It is easy to assume you’ve seen or know everything that has gone on, or that you know the entire story based on what you’ve seen on Twitter. Think again. Just because you’ve seen the tweets of two accounts means precious little, because maybe that conversation or topic has been discussed in a variety of different places with a vast array of responses and opinions. In our case alone, we write the blog here, but it also gets posted in about four different places online before the search engines even begin to have their way with it. We get responses to blogs EVERYWHERE…from our private email to YouTube and everything in-between. It’s pretty inciting to jump on the bandwagon when you see that “everyone” on one particular social media is responding in a similar way.

However, that’s really only one facet of the diamond, isn’t it?

-R

Duran Duran Answer Time

Yesterday afternoon I noticed a tweet from DDHQ about John and Roger answering questions on Tumblr this morning (or afternoon if you’re on the east coast!), dubbed Duran Duran answer time. I quickly shot a note over to Amanda saying that we should prepare some questions, which led to a fairly productive brainstorm session.

We weren’t sure how the questions would be selected or answered, but we just figured that we’d send in a bunch and hope for the best. DDHQ wasn’t very clear about WHEN to send in questions, (a tip from me: if they ever do this again – just understand that the band probably isn’t going to go back very far and find questions that were sent in say, 24 hours earlier. It’s like tweets…who really goes back that far and reads the thousands they get each day?) so we sent some in last night, and then again this morning, hoping something would get their attention.

What Amanda and I both liked about the format was that it was controlled. I didn’t have to see the thousands of other questions that came in, and while it appeared that John and Roger just took questions they saw and answered them with no real regard to the subject matter (there was more than one request for them to say hi to moms, for instance), it still probably gave John and Roger a little control and comfort as opposed to the tweetfests where John likely felt bombarded at times. Tumblr didn’t work fantastic for me this morning because I was on Skype at the same time and my aging computer hates doing video calls and pretty much anything else at the same time, but it still worked.  And let’s face it: it was something.

I refuse to believe that I’m the only fan in the world that misses seeing the band on social media, even IF I understand the reasoning behind the lack of activity. DDHQ handles social media for the band, and they do a great job keeping us informed these days….but the personal accounts for the band members are still theirs to control, and it seems to me that pretty much all of them have sort of backed off from using it.  This wouldn’t be so bad if we had never experienced that sense of connection, but naturally since we have, I think many miss it.  I know I do.

So, the idea of having band members answer questions on Tumblr isn’t a bad deal at all. It was still very exciting to see them answer people, even if plenty of the questions were downright silly.  I saw two people ask if they were hungry like the wolf, for instance. (Yes, I groaned. John and Roger dutifully answered, but I would have loved to have been a fly on the wall….)  I think that no matter the forum, you run the risk of silly questions, and even though I didn’t enjoy those questions – I’m sure the people who asked them loved seeing them answer.

But then, there was our moment of excitement when John (EXACTLY the person we were hoping!!!) answered a question that Amanda and I had submitted under our Tumblr name “dailyduranie” (unique, no?) Oh yes, I have the screen shot to share:
Screen Shot 2015-08-04 at 9.30.00 AM

Sometimes, Amanda and I feel like we’re on another planet.  She and I will feel one way about something or other, post our feelings and have the fan community come down on us hard. Both she and I have posted a little frustration about some of the media coverage they’ve received, including the article in Billboard.  You see, we want the best for this band. We love them, and we want them treated with the respect they deserve. If that’s wrong… well, I’m not all that interested in being right, I guess. I’ll leave that to other people.  So, Amanda and I decided to take a chance and send in a question about it. I figured that the worst case was that it would be ignored or that maybe John would have words of wisdom from being in this business for so long. We very much value his opinion and experience.

Lo and behold, he not only answered us, but we also got a little validation as well. It’s not just us that feels the way we do sometimes, and I appreciate that. I have no doubt that John’s used to it by now and like he says so aptly – yawn.  It isn’t worth the time to try and force people to learn how to write about in the present, it just boggles my mind a little that people still care about the drug use, the fact that the band is aging (seriously?!?), Andy Warhol’s preoccupation with Nick and whatever else.  The difference of course is that John has learned not to bother….whereas Amanda and I have a blog.

The Duran Duran answer time session ended after about an hour. While I am sure they could have answered questions for many, many, hours…it was nice of them to give an hour of their time. It wasn’t quite a tweetfest, but I still love the idea of connecting with them directly, and I like the controlled setting.  I hope they offer to do another!

-R

 

Fandom

I meant to post this earlier today…

A dear friend sent this to us, and I think it’s very worthy of posting here. Perhaps you’ll recognize yourself.

Lovingly borrowed from Tumblr. Original posting found here.  (That means that Rhonda did not write this, nor does she claim to be even remotely this poetic.)

-R

“Fandom is focus. Fandom is obsession. Fandom is insatiable consumption. Fandom is sitting for hours in front of a TV screen a movie screen a computer screen with a comic book a novel on your lap. Fandom is eyestrain and carpal tunnel syndrome and not enough exercise and staying up way, way past your bedtime.

Fandom is people you don’t tell your mother you’re meeting. Fandom is people in the closet, people out and proud, people in costumes, people in T-shirts with slogans only fifty others would understand. Fandom is a loud dinner conversation scaring the waiter and every table nearby.

Fandom is you in Germany and me in the US and him in Australia and her in Japan. Fandom is a sofabed in New York, a roadtrip to Oxnard, a friend behind a face in London. Fandom talks past timezones and accents and backgrounds. Fandom is conversation. Communication. Contact.

Fandom is drama. Fandom is melodrama. Fandom is high school. Fandom is Snacky’s law and Godwin’s law and Murphy’s law. Fandom is smarter than you. Fandom is stupider than you. Fandom is five arguments over and over and over again. Fandom is the first time you’ve ever had them.

Fandom is female. Fandom is male. Fandom lets female play at being male. Fandom bends gender, straight, gay, prude, promiscuous. Fandom is fantasy. Fandom doesn’t care about norms or taboos or boundaries. Fandom cares too much about norms and taboos and boundaries. Fandom is not real life. Fandom is closer than real life. Fandom knows what you’re really like in the bedroom. Fandom is how you would never, could never be in the bedroom.

Fandom is shipping, never shipping, het, slash, gen, none of the above, more than the above. Fandom is love for characters you didn’t create. Fandom is recreating the characters you didn’t create. Fandom is appropriation, subversion, dissention. Fandom is adoration, extrapolation, imitation. Fandom is dissection, criticism, interpretation. Fandom is changing, experimenting, attempting.

Fandom is creating. Fandom is drawing, painting, vidding: nine seasons in four minutes of love. Fandom is words, language, authoring. Fandom is essays, stories, betas, parodies, filks, zines, usenet posts, blog posts, message board posts, emails, chats, petitions, wank, concrit, feedback, recs. Fandom is writing for the first time since you were twelve. Fandom is finally calling yourself a writer.

Fandom is signal and response. Fandom is a stranger moving you to tears, anger, laughter. Fandom is you moving a stranger to speak.

Fandom is distraction. Fandom is endangering your job, your grades, your relationships, your bank account. Fandom gets no work done. Fandom is too much work. Fandom was/is just a phase. Fandom could never be just a phase. Fandom is where you found a friend, a sister, a kindred spirit. Fandom is where you found a talent, a love, a reason.

Fandom is where you found yourself.”