Tag Archives: Love Voodoo

Question of the Day: Friday, September 23, 2016

Yesterday’s winner:  Lonely in Your Nightmare

Which song would you rather have ADDED to the setlist:  Love Voodoo or (Come Up and See Me) Make Me Smile?

Question of the Day: Sunday, July 17, 2016

Yesterday’s winner:  Burning the Ground

Which song would you rather have ADDED to the setlist:  Violence of Summer or Love Voodoo?

Question of the Day: Sunday, June 12, 2016

Yesterday’s winner:  Love Voodoo

Which song would you rather have added to the setlist:  Breath After Breath or UMF?

Question of the Day: Saturday, June 11, 2016

Yesterday’s winner:  Violence of Summer

Which song would you rather have ADDED to the setlist:  All Along the Water or Love Voodoo?

Running Like a Fox to Catch Up on Duran Duran News

It is amazing how much Duran Duran news one can miss in a week. I’ve been on vacation for the past week, which has both been wonderful and incredibly isolating all at once. Aside from brief glances at my phone to see that all is well, I spent my week concentrating on real life…and it was wonderful…and today I am catching up.

I did see that in my online absence, Duran Duran played New Moon on Monday (Yes I know it was just a portion. I don’t care, I’ll take it!!), Love Voodoo (Surprised by that choice, I must admit), and Only in Dreams (A favorite of mine from Paper Gods…envious of those who have seen that one!) By all accounts and reviews I’ve read as I try to catch up on Duran Duran news this morning, it would appear that the UK tour is going very well so far.  Even when Simon tweeted a picture of a very damp and dreary Cardiff this morning, all I could think about was that I wish I were there too.  I hope everyone who is attending the shows is having a fantastic time!  Seeing the band on tour,  watching them perform songs from Paper Gods as well as the older material somehow helps to validate the time we’ve spent as fans, and allows us all that time to celebrate.

Validation as a fan is important, and we all seek it in a variety of ways, whether that is through photos with the band, or a smirk or grin from a band member. Maybe its a pair of drumsticks, or a signed piece of memorabilia. Maybe its knowing everything there is to know about the band itself and being able to recite and correct such information at will. There is something to be said for feeling as though your time has been well-spent, and there really isn’t anything wrong with that, unless seeking that feeling of self-importance overrides good sense. I’ve seen fans argue tooth and nail over the finest of detail, from the covers of albums to the dates that members have exited the band. I’m all for spirited debate, despite what some may think – but at some point, it all becomes a little silly. What difference does it really make if a version of the band began in 1978 when their first album didn’t actually come out until the 80s? Are we going to start characterizing the band as being from the 70s…now….some thirty years later??? I don’t think so.  Sometimes the intense need to prove ones worth through trivial knowledge overrides good common sense.

My husband and I have had a similar argument over the years as I’ve been an active Duran-fan online. He’s noticed the amount of time and energy fans will spend correcting and one-upping each other with regard to band history and experiences, and he used to say it was our version of a pissing contest to prove our importance – as if there’s a trophy at the end. I would get so angry with him, saying that it wasn’t true and that fans were better than that. The trouble is, the longer I’ve engaged online, the more I see that he might have a point.

Is it really going to make a difference whether I’m right or wrong about a blog I’ve written? After all, as I’m frequently reminded…”it’s just an opinion“. Probably not. Roger Taylor isn’t going to show up on my doorstep, no matter how I feel about one issue or another. There are no trophies for “Best Fan” to be awarded at the end of this journey. I know what kind of fan I am, and my feelings aren’t going to be any more or less validated by what other fans say about what I’ve written. Those are hard words to accept and follow, but we move on.  I also know that no matter how much I think I know, someone else probably knows more, and that’s OK. I think we could all (including me) stand to have a little more patience, a lot more understanding, and treat one another with a little more respect and kindness. We’ve all earned that much.

-R

They Played…WHAT?!?

Last night, Duran Duran opened up their UK Tour in Manchester.  While that event would be significant enough to blog about, it became very clear that the focus of today’s blog would be something much more specific after seeing and receiving tweets, posts, etc. about last night’s setlist!  If you haven’t seen it yet, let me post it here:

Manchester Setlist

General Observations

Now, if you know anything about me, I could probably analyze this setlist for hours.  I will try to refrain from going overboard to just give a few observations.  First, before I even dive into the setlist itself, I notice that at the very top of this setlist are the words, “Version 7”.  I guess that means that there were 6 versions before that!  I am well-aware of how much debate, discussion, etc. goes into the band’s setlist and this just proved it to me once again.  I would love to know what was on the other versions!  Something else I noticed before I get to the songs themselves is the number of tracks and how some clearly blended into each other.  If you count each song played (partially or otherwise), the band played 22 songs.  Not bad.  That said, 5 of those songs were blended together.  The first one being Sunrise and New Moon.  My understanding is that they didn’t play  all of New Moon.  The other part of the setlist with blended tracks included Danceophobia, Too Much Information and Girls on Film.  They did the same for the US tour.  In that case, I have to assume that they played almost all of those tracks.  (If I’m wrong on this, Manchester attendees, let me know!)

Surprise Songs

By now, everyone in Duranland has probably seen or heard that Duran busted out some unexpected songs!  The first one, Only in Dreams, was a new one off of Paper Gods.  This brought the number of Paper Gods tracks up to 6 from the 5 that they had been playing in the US.  I have been anxiously refreshing YouTube to see if anyone has put this video up for the world to see.  So far, no Only in Dreams.

The next surprise song was Love Voodoo!  If someone would have said that they would have played this one without me getting lots of confirmations that they did, I wouldn’t have believed him/her.  This is not a song that often gets in my radar but, from what I could tell, people were absolutely thrilled that they decided to dive into an album track like this one!  Like Only in Dreams, I haven’t seen anything on YouTube but I did see a clip on Duran Duran Argentina’s Facebook page, if you are interested!

Of course, the biggest surprise and probably the most welcome for many fans was the inclusion of New Moon on Monday.  This is a song that many, many, many fans love and figured that they would never have a chance to hear live, including myself.  I would love to hear any or all of it live.  I know that some attendees were disappointed that the band didn’t play the whole song, which I can understand, but I figure that some is better than nothing!  This one I did find on YouTube and I have to admit that it sounds absolutely fabulous!!!

Other Reactions

In general, most fans seem to be thrilled with this setlist!  While, yes, some might argue (and probably rightly so) that there still could be more changes, fans do appreciate that they included these surprise tracks.  Many US fans, for example, expressed hope that they continue playing songs like New Moon when the band comes back to the States.  I can’t blame them as I feel the same way.

While most of the reactions were generally positive, there were still some fans who pondered the decision to include representation of some albums over others.  Let’s look at album distribution from this setlist:

First Album – Planet Earth, Girls on Film (2 songs)
Rio – Hungry Like the Wolf, Save a Prayer, Rio (3 songs)
Seven and the Ragged Tiger – New Moon on Monday (1 song)
Wild Boys and A View to a Kill
Notorious – Notorious (1 song)
Big Thing – I Don’t Want Your Love (1 song)
Liberty- (0 songs)
Wedding Album – Come Undone, Love Voodoo, Ordinary World, Too Much Information (4 songs)
Thank You – White Lines (1 song)
Medazzaland- (0 songs)
Pop Trash- (0 songs)
Astronaut – Sunrise (1 song)
Red Carpet Massacre- (0 songs)
All You Need Is Now- (0 songs)
Paper Gods – Paper Gods, Last Night in the City, Only in Dreams, Pressure Off, Danceophobia, What Are the Chances (6 songs)

Clearly, Paper Gods ruled the setlist.  What is interesting to me is how the Wedding Album wasn’t that far behind.  In fact, they played more tracks from that album than Rio!  That is a lot!  Then, of course, there weren’t any from Liberty, Medazzaland, Pop Trash, and Red Carpet Massacre.  Generally, none of those albums were fan favorites so that is not surprising that there wasn’t any representation in the setlist.  Some fans did wonder why there wasn’t any representation from All You Need Is Now.  That is a question I can’t answer.  Some fans felt strongly that this was an insult since so many fans loved that album.  While I, too, love that album, I have to assume that they aren’t playing anything off it for a good reason.

No matter the reaction to last night’s setlist, one thing is certain.  I’m anxious to see what the rest of the set lists looks like from here on out!

-A

Question of the Day: Saturday, January 31, 2015

Yesterday’s winner:  All She Wants Is

Which song would make the better 3rd track on the ultimate Duran Duran album?  It would follow the songs, Rio and Planet Earth.